The commonplace book of Margaret Lewis : published as "The Valley manuscript"
1940
975.502 S929, 1940
Available at Main Library
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS | |
Title
The commonplace book of Margaret Lewis : published as "The Valley manuscript"
Variant Title
The Valley manuscript (parallel)
Published
Salem, Va. s.n. 1940
Description
[2], 28 p. ; 23 cm.
Call Number
975.502 S929, 1940
System Control No.
(OCoLC)06148972
Note
Cover title.
Caption title: Commonplace book of Margaret Lynn Lewis, who was the wife of John Lewis, one of the first leading settlers in the Shenandoah Valley and the mother of General Andrew Lewis.
First published in the magazine "The Land we love", v. 6, no. 3, Jan. 1869; Submitted by Fanny Fielding, of Norfolk, Va., as: "The Valley manuscript. < From a collection of archives known in our household by the above title, from which I have recently been making excerpts ...>" The reprint differs slightly from this version, with some paragraphs omitted.
The commonplace book is called the "Book of comfort" in W. O. Stevens' The Shenandoah and its byways, p. 211-217.
The authenticity of the diary has not been proved, as the original manuscript has not been found. Probably fictitious. Cf. p. 1.
L1994.1.353
Caption title: Commonplace book of Margaret Lynn Lewis, who was the wife of John Lewis, one of the first leading settlers in the Shenandoah Valley and the mother of General Andrew Lewis.
First published in the magazine "The Land we love", v. 6, no. 3, Jan. 1869; Submitted by Fanny Fielding, of Norfolk, Va., as: "The Valley manuscript. < From a collection of archives known in our household by the above title, from which I have recently been making excerpts ...>" The reprint differs slightly from this version, with some paragraphs omitted.
The commonplace book is called the "Book of comfort" in W. O. Stevens' The Shenandoah and its byways, p. 211-217.
The authenticity of the diary has not been proved, as the original manuscript has not been found. Probably fictitious. Cf. p. 1.
L1994.1.353
Record Appears in