Who should rule at home? : confronting the elite in British New York City
2017
974.7102 G651 2017
Available at Main Library
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS | |
Title
Who should rule at home? : confronting the elite in British New York City
Variant Title
Confronting the elite in British New York City
Published
Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2017.
Description
x, 296 p. : ill., maps ; 24 cm.
Call Number
974.7102 G651 2017
System Control No.
(OCoLC)957264925
Note
Goodfriend argues that the high-ranking gentlemen who figure so prominently in most accounts of New York City's evolution from 1664, when the English captured the small Dutch outpost of New Amsterdam, to the eve of American independence in 1776 were far from invincible and that the degree of cultural power they held has been exaggerated. The urban elite experienced challenges to its cultural authority at different times, from different groups, and in a variety of settings.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Contents: The pan-ethnic elite and the problem of cultural authority -- The indigestible Dutch -- The crystallization of an anti-Dutch narrative -- From nation to linguistic community -- Pious commoners -- George Whitefield awakens New York City -- Becoming religious consumers -- Defiant dependents -- "Master of the house"? -- Attached to the household -- Sabotaging the civilizers -- Tipping the cultural scales.
L2018M85
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Contents: The pan-ethnic elite and the problem of cultural authority -- The indigestible Dutch -- The crystallization of an anti-Dutch narrative -- From nation to linguistic community -- Pious commoners -- George Whitefield awakens New York City -- Becoming religious consumers -- Defiant dependents -- "Master of the house"? -- Attached to the household -- Sabotaging the civilizers -- Tipping the cultural scales.
L2018M85
Added Author
Record Appears in